Solar Sizing Re-run, Sept 2026 (600 Wp panels)

This page re-runs the solar sizing from Solar Plus Battery Economic Case (Sezibwa) on three months of live OpenEMS load. It answers one question: is 7 to 8 panels (600 Wp each) still the best PV size for Sezibwa, and does it cut the energy bill in half?

Answer

Yes. With 600 Wp panels:

Past about 5 kWp each extra panel adds little. The battery is already full by midday, and without grid export the surplus is wasted.

What changed since August

Input August model This re-run
Load data Modbus logger archive, Mar to Aug 2026 OpenEMS aggregate meter DTSU666 (serial 221123297561), 1 Jul to 28 Sep 2026, 76 days of data
Average load 21.3 kWh/day 25.8 kWh/day
Baseline energy bill about 374,000 UGX/month about 454,000 UGX/month
Panel size kWp only 600 Wp panels

The model code and economics are otherwise unchanged. One correction was made: the daily average now divides by the hours actually covered by data, not the calendar span, so data gaps (for example the site internet outage of 25 to 26 Sep) no longer understate the load.

Cost of an 8 panel install (at cost)

Priced from the Rincol catalogue (August 2026 buy prices), with the railing at 421,000 UGX per 4 panel kit:

Item Qty Cost (UGX)
600 Wp mono panel (GS600N-144M) at 320,250 8 2,562,000
Railing kit (4 panels per kit) at 421,000 2 842,000
6 mm2 UV solar cable at 12,000/m 40 m 480,000
PV combiner box (MC4) 1 80,000
DC circuit breaker 20 A 1 25,000
Surge protector (a DC rated one is still to be sourced) 1 35,000
Earthing (rod, clamps, conductor) 1 80,000
MC4 connectors (estimate) 6 pairs 48,000
Labour and transport 1 250,000
Total 4,402,000

Panels and railing are 3.4M, and the rest of the balance of system and labour adds about 1.0M. The inverter (3.84M) and battery (5.57M) are already paid for, so these are the only new costs.

Results (600 Wp panels, no grid export, at cost)

Panels kWp Saving per month (UGX) Bill cut Solar wasted Cost (UGX) Simple payback IRR NPV at 15% (UGX)
5 3.0 199,406 44% 4% 3.44M 1.4 yr 69% 10.9M
6 3.6 225,904 50% 10% 3.76M 1.4 yr 71% 12.4M
7 4.2 247,923 55% 16% 4.08M 1.4 yr 72% 13.6M
8 4.8 263,462 58% 22% 4.40M 1.4 yr 71% 14.3M
9 5.4 273,637 60% 28% 5.14M 1.6 yr 63% 14.3M
10 6.0 281,205 62% 33% 5.46M 1.6 yr 61% 14.5M
11 6.6 287,350 63% 38% 5.78M 1.7 yr 59% 14.6M
12 7.2 292,746 64% 42% 6.10M 1.7 yr 56% 14.6M

Cost is built per panel count: panels, one railing kit per 4 panels, and a fixed 40 m of cable, combiner, breaker, surge protector, earthing, connectors and labour. 4 panels is left out because a 4 panel string (about 175 V) is below the inverter's 200 V MPPT minimum. The SRNE ASP48120SH3 has 2 MPPT inputs of up to 9 kW each at 200 to 650 V, so 5 to 14 panels fit on one string.

For a turnkey quote at Rincol selling prices, add roughly 20 to 25% (the August 7 panel quote was 5.02M at sell prices against 4.16M at cost).

Battery only (the existing SRNE, no panels) saves about 34,000 UGX/month (8%) on the model's arbitrage policy.

How to read it

Recommendation

Install 8 panels of 600 Wp (4.8 kWp) on the existing SRNE inverter and battery, for about 4.4M UGX at cost. That cuts the energy bill by 58% (about 263,000 UGX/month) and pays back in about 1.4 years. 7 panels (4.1M, 55%) is the cheaper option. Going above 8 only makes sense with grid export (net metering) or more battery storage.

Assumptions and caveats

Reproduce

The model is versioned in the nfe-modbus-energy-logger repository under scripts/solar_sim/ (issue #89, PR #90, in review). From the repo root:

python3 scripts/solar_sim/sweep_bom.py scripts/solar_sim/m100_openems.csv
python3 scripts/solar_sim/nfe_solar_model.py scripts/solar_sim/m100_openems.csv

m100_openems.csv holds the site aggregate energy in 15 minute steps (site totals only, no per customer data).


Revision #4
Created 2026-09-28 20:33:33 UTC by hillary.arinda
Updated 2026-09-28 21:28:56 UTC by hillary.arinda